Employing PIPRECIA-S weighting with MABAC: a strategy for identifying organizational leadership elections

Abstract

The election of organizational leaders, especially in organizations whose members have diverse backgrounds and interests, can cause various problems. Problems in the selection of school organization leaders include the absence of an objective selection of organizational leadership candidates because they are selected based on comparisons between candidates without considering the criteria in the selection of organizational leadership candidates. Research related to the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) and simplified pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (PIPRECIA-S) methods has never been conducted so far, so it is a reference in conducting this research using the MABAC and PIPRECIA-S methods. This study aims to select the head of the school organization using the MABAC method and PIPRECIA-S weighting can increase the objectivity of the criteria assessment results by relying on calculations from the PIPRECIA-S weighting method. Based on the selection results using the MABAC method and PIPRECIA-S weighting, candidate 1 was recommended as the leader of the school organization because it achieved rank 1 with a total score of 0.293. The contribution of this research is to help in the selection of the head of the organization using the PIPRECIA-S and MABAC methods as a decision-making solution.